Attorneys and Parties

The People ex rel. David A. Arpino on behalf of Conrod Getten
Petitioner
Attorneys: David A. Arpino

Michael J. Franchi
Respondent
Attorneys: Raymond A. Tierney, Daniella Sciarretta

Raymond A. Tierney
Respondent
Attorneys: Raymond A. Tierney, Daniella Sciarretta

Brief Summary

Issue

Criminal procedure—pretrial detention and bail conditions in New York.

Lower Court Held

Getten remained incarcerated pending trial on Suffolk County Indictment No. 70062/2026; release was not granted by the lower court.

What Was Overturned

The prior custodial status without a set, reasonable bail package was replaced with a specific bail order and conditions.

Why

Upon the respondents’ consent, the Appellate Division sustained the habeas writ to set bail with electronic monitoring and related conditions pursuant to CPL 510.40(4)(c) and (d) [CPL 510.40 sets conditions of release; subdivision (4)(c) authorizes electronic monitoring by a qualified entity; subdivision (4)(d) provides for court proceedings upon violations].

Background

The People, on the relation of David A. Arpino, sought habeas corpus relief on behalf of Conrod Getten, requesting release on his own recognizance or, alternatively, the setting of reasonable bail in connection with Suffolk County Indictment No. 70062/2026.

Lower Court Decision

Not specified in detail; Getten remained incarcerated and had not obtained the requested release or reasonable bail from the County Court.

Appellate Division Reversal

The writ was sustained to the extent of setting bail, upon respondents’ consent, as follows: (1) $150,000 insurance company bail bond; or (2) $750,000 partially secured bond with 10% down; or (3) $75,000 cash alternative. Conditions include: electronic monitoring with a qualified entity pursuant to CPL 510.40(4)(c), with violations to be reported to the Suffolk County District Attorney and further proceedings under CPL 510.40(4)(d) to be conducted by the County Court; surrender of all passports or an affidavit of non-possession with a promise not to apply for new or replacement passports; and an affidavit agreeing to waive the right to oppose extradition if he leaves the jurisdiction. Upon proof of compliance, the Warden is directed to immediately release Getten.

Legal Significance

Confirms that habeas corpus is an appropriate vehicle for reviewing pretrial detention and setting bail conditions, and that the Appellate Division may set a structured bail package—including electronic monitoring and passport/extradition conditions—consistent with CPL 510.40.

🔑 Key Takeaway

On consent, the Appellate Division set a tailored bail package with electronic monitoring and passport/extradition safeguards, directing Getten’s immediate release upon compliance.