Diaz v Jhedrian Logistics Corp.
Categories
Attorneys and Parties
Brief Summary
Motor vehicle personal injury negligence action involving whether the driver of the plaintiffs' vehicle could be held liable when that vehicle was allegedly struck in the rear by another vehicle.
The Supreme Court, Queens County, denied defendant Jose Arce's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.
The Appellate Division reversed the order denying Arce summary judgment and granted dismissal of the complaint against him.
Arce made a prima facie showing that he was not at fault in the accident through his affidavit. The plaintiffs submitted no affidavit or other evidentiary material rebutting that showing and failed to establish that the motion was premature under CPLR 3212(f) [rule permitting denial or delay of summary judgment where essential opposing facts are unavailable].
Background
The plaintiffs sued to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained in a motor vehicle accident. They were passengers in a vehicle operated by defendant Jose Arce when that vehicle allegedly was rear-ended by a vehicle owned by defendant Jhedrian Logistics Corp.
Lower Court Decision
The Supreme Court denied Arce's motion for summary judgment seeking dismissal of the complaint against him, leaving the claims against him pending.
Appellate Division Reversal
The Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed on the law and with costs, holding that Arce established prima facie that he was not at fault in the happening of the accident. Because the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact and failed to show prematurity under CPLR 3212(f) [rule permitting denial or delay of summary judgment where essential opposing facts are unavailable], the court granted Arce summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against him.
Legal Significance
The decision reinforces that a defendant in a negligence action may obtain summary judgment by affirmatively showing lack of fault, and that once such a prima facie showing is made, the opposing party must submit competent evidence creating a factual dispute. Mere reliance on allegations, without affidavits or other proof, is insufficient.
In a rear-end collision case, a defendant driver can secure dismissal if the evidence shows he was not negligent and the plaintiffs offer no evidence to the contrary or valid basis to delay the motion.